Breast Feeding is apparently a WAR now ...

"Babytalk" magazine has received over 700 letters regarding this cover featuring a baby nursing.

People are outraged and disgusted. One woman even shredded the cover so that her teenage son wouldn't see the sinful "sexual content". Obviously she hasn't seen the dozens of "Playboy" and "Maxim" issues under his mattress or the porn files on his computer.

Other women say, "Men are sexually excited visually. A breast is a breast. It doesn't matter to them whether it's being used to feed a baby or if it's being used in a porn movie." Which in my opinion seems to be a degrading statement to the male gender. Men are human beings, not sexually rabid monsters.

Am I the only person alive who thinks that these people are over-reacting? Even at first glance, I thought it was a beautiful picture depicting a baby's innocent dependence on its loving mother.

It's only a breast. Why are people disgusted? At any shopping mall in my area, you will find dozens of fat girls sitting on benches, leaning forward with their pant waists sinking down past their slimy buttcracks, revealing butterfly tattoos and g-strings. That's perfectly acceptable.

It's also perfectly acceptable for teenage girls to dress like hookers and prance around with their breasts and buttocks partially exposed. But entirely covering a breast while feeding a hungry baby in a secluded area is NOT tolerated and is called "sexual".

Sometimes the world's most disgusting perverts masquerade in Puritan skin.

[Full Article Here]